JohnHusky JohnHusky

New war soon to come?

▼

New war soon to come?

Iran & Israel with US help

from Sins Forums
Just been reading a danish artikel about some tension between Iran & Israel
So are wo gonna see a new war soon?

It seems like Iran is making atomic weapons...
The US is trying to make Iran stop the production of this kinds of weapons diplomatically. But if it failes. The US havent denied an military action can happen.

This is going to very bad, if they got the nukes ready.

I think its only a matter of time before we see another war, the US is dragging its ppl into

What do you think is going to happen?

off-topic
125,027 views 62 replies
Reply #26 from Sins Forums Top
And Schem, we don't have a missile defense system that could protect us from an all out attack. Sure we have some interceptor missles here and there... but that is not nearly sufficient to stop everything. Stop kidding yourself

I'm not kidding myself! the only issue would be rapid deployment.
jeez.
Reply #27 from Sins Forums Top
Think about it. If you were the leader of a country, would you join an organization that had the power to deploy your military and tell you what to do and not to do? No. Or maybe you would but if they told you not to do something that you really wanted to then you would just drop out.


As i said above. Denmark, United Kingdom and other countrys did go agaist the wishes of the UN, when the US was attacking iraq, and asked for help or was it just the countrys that just wanted to help? dont remember, and its not the point.
The point is that a few countrys did go agaist the UN wishes. But was are still in it...


Funny thing is France and Great Britan were the leading opposers to the war in Iraq, however when we declared war so did they. Every single country wants a world immage, and following the US in was the 'best' thing to do. Mostly because the other soldiers were there in small amounts, there were there as more of a statement than anything else.

ALL OF OUR DATA FROM A CUMULATIVE 100 COUNTRIES MUST BE FREAKING WRONG!!! what was i THINKING??? god smite me now...


Only 100, wow the US is truely falling behind.

the question of an evil man is not the measures he is willing to take for his country, but the measures he takes for himself.


OMG!! Its not logic coming out of Schem anymore, its wisdom too.

*side hands multi a note*
consider the offer, I think you'll find it a bit more "satisfactory"


Just think Mutli, if you support Schem he will never shut up.
Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #28 from Sins Forums Top
its not like either one of us shut up anyway!
OMG!! Its not logic coming out of Schem anymore, its wisdom too

philosophy is just another form of logic.
Reply #29 from Sins Forums Top
philosophy is just another form of logic.


Not really, sometimes they are the complete opposites. Logic has structure, philosophy is free flowing.
Reply #30 from Sins Forums Top
philosophy is logical, it may not be as rigorous as math or science, but you dont make a statement without some sort of logical backup.
Reply #31 from Sins Forums Top
Exactly, so there are rules to philosophy, thank you for proving my other point
Reply #32 from Sins Forums Top
but thats not a rule. its a qualification.
Reply #33 from Sins Forums Top
Not really, more like a rule.

Your trying to figure out a way out of my trap. I posted the other aruguement to lure you in.

Knowing you cant resist arguing that in the end youll end up proving one point or the other.
Reply #34 from Sins Forums Top
how can the power of pure musing stand with rules?
it cannot!
Knowing you cant resist arguing that in the end youll end up proving one point or the other

or I'll change your perspective
a rule is something placed in by a hierarchy or power. a guidline is something generally agreed upon.
so thats not a rule, there is no high council of philosophers.
Reply #35 from Sins Forums Top
a rule is something placed in by a hierarchy or power. a guidline is something generally agreed upon.
so thats not a rule, there is no high council of philosophers.


Maybe not one that is official, and a rule doesnt need to be set by a hierarchy or anything of power.

For then in truth we would only have dictorial governments.
Reply #36 from Sins Forums Top
a rule doesnt need to be set by a hierarchy or anything of power

yeah, yeah you do.
and what would that have to do with dictorial governments? even nondictator governments have rules.
Reply #37 from Sins Forums Top
yeah, yeah you do.
and what would that have to do with dictorial governments? even nondictator governments have rules.


True, but nondictorial governments ussually arent hierarchies .

And then consider social taboos. They are techinically rules, which everyone follows.

Reply #38 from Sins Forums Top
are you kidding me?
so the deputy of the colorado police departement doesnt fall under the president's power.
and I said "or"
Reply #39 from Sins Forums Top
so the deputy of the colorado police departement doesnt fall under the president's power.


The president isnt the lawmaker. And I thought you were American.
Reply #40 from Sins Forums Top
I am American, and thats a heirarchy regardless.

as for a lawmaking heirarchy: local state and federal levels. not to mention the lawmaker's clerks.
and besides, you said:
nondictorial governments ussually arent hierarchies

which was what I was refering to.
Reply #41 from Sins Forums Top
I am American, and thats a heirarchy regardless.

as for a lawmaking heirarchy: local state and federal levels. not to mention the lawmaker's clerks.
and besides, you said:

nondictorial governments ussually arent hierarchies

which was what I was refering to.


as for a lawmaking heirarchy: local state and federal levels. not to mention the lawmaker's clerks.
and besides, you said:



Can you please explain your self-contradiction.
Reply #42 from Sins Forums Top
WHAT contradiction?
there isnt any. I just said that your statement of:
nondictorial governments ussually arent hierarchies

is wrong.
Reply #43 from Sins Forums Top
So a democracy is governmed by an elite group now is it.

I thought this country was about the power of the people, guess I was mislead by all the propoganda
Reply #44 from Sins Forums Top
So a democracy is governmed by an elite group now is it

... way to not understand

a hierarchy of power isn't a role of elitism, thats why we have elections.
I thought this country was about the power of the people, guess I was mislead by all the propoganda

people are too stupid to trust with government. we just let them choose the direction of the policy.
Reply #45 from Sins Forums Top
a hierarchy of power isn't a role of elitism, thats why we have elections.


Check the dictionary.

people are too stupid to trust with government. we just let them choose the direction of the policy.


Guess youll never be voting then.

Reply #46 from Sins Forums Top
Guess youll never be voting then.

thats the purpose of voting. to choose direction, but not policy.

and besides, I'd be a very poor policy maker.
Check the dictionary.

and I quote:
any system of persons or things ranked one above another.
so why don't you check YOUR dictionary?
Reply #47 from Sins Forums Top
I did, I just used another definition, you never specified which, so I chose the one that fit my arguement.
Reply #48 from Sins Forums Top
thats not a viable excuse. You should be intelligent to know which definition I was using, just look in context.
Reply #49 from Sins Forums Top
You should be intelligent to know which definition I was using, just look in context.


The fact that you didnt specify made the arguement open to my devious ways
Reply #50 from Sins Forums Top
only if you want to claim that you're an idiot.
in which case I win.