If anyone says prayer in school is the answer to all of society's problems, I will go absolutely nuts. You may as well start going nuts, because lots of people really do believe this.
and we will back off when the dnc gets its head out of the FARLEFT crazies asses. So, I guess I have to ask again, and this is really a rhetorical question, as you really just answered it - Who is cramming whose ideas down whose throats? In other words, what you're asking for isn't relevant, bec
Another thing. Why is this in the humor section? I'm kind of missing the joke, I suppose.
I think the conservatives here are driving off the liberals. I'm seeing less and less postings by liberals all the time. And, I've read so many hate articles coming from conservatives directed at liberals, and many, many of them are coming from you, moderateman. So, I think that when the only person who seems to think you're hateful is dabe, maybe it's because the only others left here to post are conservatives of like mind. Is this the way joeuser
You cannot go after every dictator at the same time, you have to start somewhere. Is that what we're doing? Oh God, forgive us for we have sinned.......... and are continuing to sin.
Righties are in power right now. So, who is ramming who's crap down who'd throat? I'd like to see the righties back the hell off, actually. They are quite the sickening lot.
So you support Nambla as well? By the statement above it sure indicates your acceptance of them. The problem with nambla is that it breaks a host of laws concerning sex and children, rape being the most obvious. So, the comparison is really not very good. Tolerance of gays does not support breaking l
You are nothing but an anon troll who hides behind stupidiity. Hey moron, here's a clue. Registration is FREE and you can join anytime. But cowards never do. twerp. Nasty response, don't ya think? Name calling is a no-no here. I've seen you personally rail against others for this behavior. So, who made you the joeuser cop, and also give you the liberty to do what you won't tolerate from other bloggers?
Zinkadoodle: Yeah, like Rush Limbaugh stating that you're either "for Bush or against Jesus." Gideon: Bingo. And VERY offensive. DrGuy: And also very wrong. DrGuy, what's wrong here? Are you saying you agree that it was a "wrong" and offensive thing to say? Or, are you saying that Limbaugh didn't say that? I hope it's the former, because Limbaugh DID say that, for the world to hear. I heard it with my own ears.</
How many of you would save a child by sacrificing an already discarded zygote? How many of you would save YOUR child by sacrificing an already discarded zygote? If a building was burning down and you had the choice of saving a child or saving a petri dish with zygotes, which would you save? How many of you would sacrifice someone's child to "free" an Iraqi? How many of you would sacrifice YOUR child to "free" an Iraq
"This was disappointing to see." Disappointing, but not surprising.
MM posts this moronic garbage from time to time, apparently, just to invite liberals and democrats in to get skewered by the neoconservatives here. Not many biters anymore. You're not worth it.
"Ther is NO BAN on funding OR research. Only on fed funding of developing new lines of cells! The research is ongoing and will not stop!" I think I remember you stating in other places that the guv has not banned research, but only funding. You talking, I believe. Fact is, our pres is trying all he can to stop the funding, which is where the problem is here. And, according to what I've read and heard, though I have no references yet, scienti
"What is wrong with your money? is it not as spendable? Give to the research! if that is your mantra, put your money where your mouth is, NOT MINE." Well then, this is how I feel about the war in Iraq. I don't want MY money being spent on it. I don't want my money being spent on the "abstinence only" fiasco. I don't want my money being spent on subsidizing new sports stadiums. Fact is, our money gets spent where our government dec
"NOBODY listens to Al Franken, do they?" I do "Conservatives, on the other hand, are more consistently interesting." If you call lying and subverting the constitution and imposing christianity on everyone "interesting", I guess I'd have to agree with you. "What's more, LIBERALS listen to conservative hosts, ostensibly to "know t
"First, it has already been pointed out to you that the ban is on funding, not research." The fact that the ban is on funding is indicative of a particular mindset, regardless that the ban is not on research. And, that is what is so aggravating. And, how long would it take if the neoconservatives have their specific way, will it take for it to be a ban on research, too. That is really what they want, but don't have the brass to do it, for f
I'm new here, and this is my first post, so here goes...... Should the President veto the legislation? Absolutely NOT Should Congress over-ride the veto and expand the research as suggested in the House bill? Absolutely YES If you faced the choice that the President has made, what would you have done? Resign in disgrace. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/smil
I'm new at this, so please bear with me, and give me some latitude. I'm a quick study, and will get the hang of this post haste. Thanks. I'm going to delve into the reading part of this to get the "lay of the land". zinkadoodle
JoeUser Forums