Haven't most of them moved to Canada by now? Nope. Well, maybe most, but not me.
zinkadoodle
One more thing. I do NOT ignore anything. I just see it differently. Now, end of discussion.
Bakerstreet, is is quite clear that we will never ever agree on anything. You tell me I'm "wrong"; I don't know what I'm talking about; big government this and that. I tell you I don't buy your side of the story. That simple. I guess we'll just leave it at that. You can preach all you want. I will never buy it. I can preach all I want. You will never buy it. It's different philosophies for living. End of discussion.
It's funny thinking about the S. Court as left-sided when it handed down the decision that allowed Bush to be president in the first place. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/smiles/Laugh.gif" border=0 ALIGN="ab
What is your freakin' problem. I heard. So what? I wrote about what I heard. Like no one else here does that. This is exactly the crap I'm talking about. I post, and get nothing but derision, just because I am a liberal. All I am saying is that this site is not a Rush Limbaugh blog or a DU blog. It's an everyfreakinthing blog. That's my point. I do not have a problem debating, except with the likes of you two %^&#s. You're b
So, it's not so much a case that there is no difference between conservatives and the religious right, rather that they are in the same party "voting for the same candidate' [Dr. Guy] with the RR calling the shots. That's exactly right. Same way most athiests belong to the democratic side. And, the di
Although I have never tried to, I've heard the rightie sites are just as restrictive. If you post dissent, they'll ban you, same as the leftie sites. One of the reasons I come here is because this site bills itself as a blogsite for the "average joe". Then, it asounds me that the righties seem to really not just debate, but hate me for doing so, and hate me for being rather forceful in my arguments. That's what really galls me. And, though some ar
I think you all are making dabe's point here. It's ok to berate and browbeat when conservatives do it to liberals, but not the other way around. It's ok to just continually patronize and insult, as long as it's done the JU way. Read the above posts, and dabe's article. Man oh man, she is so right on. There is a very clear and distinct double standard here. I'm starting to now feel the brunt of it. I guess the administrators of this site like it
Well, let's talk about blind hate, OK. You jingo righties seem to have these patriotic blinders on. Doesn't matter what moronic thing our stupid president says; doesn't matter what destructive game our president gets our country into; doesn't matter that he's repealing all environmental laws he can wrap his twisted little brain around; doesn't matter that he's skimming bucks off your backs to give to his rich and beholdin' buddies. You guys will jus
Kind of simple really. Burning a cross is a symbol of hate, meant to incite more hatred. Burning the flag is a symbol of protest against what our country is doing. Of course, this is only in the US. And, God knows how often flag burning occurs. Cripes, one case of burning one in over two decades. If ever we needed that Constitutional Amendment............... Thing is, crosses get burned way more often (statistics anyone?). And, they
I just love how everyone is caught up telling me what me intentions are that that fail to actually debate me on the points I have raised. It's called jingo spinning and twisting. God forbid you may have an actual point, particularly when it comes to points not flattering to the dubya dummy.
which permits people to do as they like as long as government doesn't compel people to a particular belief system. Exactly! Which is why I do feel somewhat threatened when the RR and the conservatives try to legislate what they believe based on what is their concept of morality and bible thumping. Fra
Okay I'll liven it up some.....Hey Doc, your a "jerk" I was gonna say, "You must be bored", then decided that's not right. You're just boring. ....... just tryin' to liven it up
Thoughts? Bad, bad, bad, bad, bad.................. And personally, I have absolutely no interest in this country or myself being more Christ-like. Why would I? I am not a Christian. But, to presume that I am without a moral compass because I am not Christian is racist, discriminatory, and no better than any other religion-based nation. I don't want to see this country fashioned after any goddamm religion.
WHat you describe is the RR, not conservatives. Both the religious right and conservatives want to shove their agendas up our asses. To me, it's a distinction without a difference.
ZInk is a dud Excuuuuuuuuse me................... I believe you've just violated the TOS. Oh moderators......... DrGuy is resorting to namecalling. Banish the boor!
Do tell, drmiler, which post would that be? As for setting her free, I'm 100% pro. And, I do thank god you're not the administrator.
fabricating lies BULL FREAKIN' SHIT
it's the dragging of high office throught the mud, the outright lies, the total disrespect for the Presidentcy {his office} that rankles me. This is a big difference between how we view our present administration. I have no qualms about dragging the "high office" through the mud, as long as they contin
Apparently the only flaming issue about it now is, maybe we need an amendment banning the banning of burning the flag, so the whole thing will just go up in flames. ;~D Works for me.
I'd go for the guy that lied about a blow job over the guy that lied about a war any day You got dat right!!!! Can you picture the campaign ads. It would be great. Bring it on!!!!! In all seriousness, I hate the idea. It's downright scary. I really am convinced that the e
........ so the (Classical) Liberal question still stands, "How can we live, relatively harmoniously, side by side without agreeing?" That clearly is the "liberal question", isn't it. It's why I cannot, for the life of me, understand why conservatives refuse to accept homosexuality, to the point of eit
God, you are such an ass. I didn't misrepresent anything you said. You said the people that are up in arms about homosexual public displays of sexuality are tolerant of such hetorosexual displays. That isn't true. The AFA is just as intolerant of hetorsexual sexually-themed entertainment. You are right,
someone seeing american football for the first time might easily conclude it's a gay game. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/
I NEVER said your responce was idiotic, did I? No, I didn't accuse you of saying that. But, I said YOUR response was. And is. As for the question, there's nothing to answer. You were just, for whatever reason, I dunno...... you hate me because I'm a liberal ........, not happy with m